Difference between revisions of "Talk:Forge"

From XPwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
I like how this is setup a lot, as a basic character page - espically the links to notable NPC's, and events, and ESPICALLY the first apperance link, and the "Trivia" at the bottom. You could throw a link to the real wikipedia article of the disorder if you wanted as well. --[[User:Frito|Frito]] 13:33, 10 July 2006 (EDT)
 
I like how this is setup a lot, as a basic character page - espically the links to notable NPC's, and events, and ESPICALLY the first apperance link, and the "Trivia" at the bottom. You could throw a link to the real wikipedia article of the disorder if you wanted as well. --[[User:Frito|Frito]] 13:33, 10 July 2006 (EDT)
 +
 +
Yeah, I'm liking this too. Especially as a base - doesn't require huge amounts of work to get _something_ up and it's guided so people don't sit there and go "urk" and not be able to know where to start. Splitting up the Biography and the significant game events slots in beautifully with what we've established for the month summaries. Basically you stick in the significant events, with plot names referenced so people can look them up in the Wiki, and it saves writing (and reading) a huge summary of what's gone on for the more trauma-attracting characters and hopefully nudges people towards reading the actual logs. The month summaries will reference the non-plot events (or if they don't and someone feels they should, they can edit that in. ;) )
 +
 +
And yep, the lack of a toolbar is a Mac thing - logged in at work and I can see it fine, dammit. Will check my preferences to make sure the cookies are enabled. --[[User:Rossi|Rossi]] 14:44, 10 July 2006 (EDT)

Revision as of 13:44, 10 July 2006

I like how this is setup a lot, as a basic character page - espically the links to notable NPC's, and events, and ESPICALLY the first apperance link, and the "Trivia" at the bottom. You could throw a link to the real wikipedia article of the disorder if you wanted as well. --Frito 13:33, 10 July 2006 (EDT)

Yeah, I'm liking this too. Especially as a base - doesn't require huge amounts of work to get _something_ up and it's guided so people don't sit there and go "urk" and not be able to know where to start. Splitting up the Biography and the significant game events slots in beautifully with what we've established for the month summaries. Basically you stick in the significant events, with plot names referenced so people can look them up in the Wiki, and it saves writing (and reading) a huge summary of what's gone on for the more trauma-attracting characters and hopefully nudges people towards reading the actual logs. The month summaries will reference the non-plot events (or if they don't and someone feels they should, they can edit that in. ;) )

And yep, the lack of a toolbar is a Mac thing - logged in at work and I can see it fine, dammit. Will check my preferences to make sure the cookies are enabled. --Rossi 14:44, 10 July 2006 (EDT)